The recent booing of ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt at a university commencement speech has sparked an interesting discussion about the public's perception of AI. Schmidt's speech, which aimed to strike a balance between acknowledging students' fears and promoting the potential of AI, was met with hostility. This reaction is not isolated; it mirrors a broader trend of negative sentiment towards AI, as evidenced by similar incidents involving other speakers.
Schmidt's ill-advised statement about AI being a 'rocket ship' and his suggestion that students should 'get on' without questioning their role may have contributed to the negative reaction. The crowd's reaction suggests a sense of being left behind, with the fear of AI replacing jobs and the potential for exploitation resonating with the students.
The author argues that these spontaneous reactions to commencement speakers can serve as a barometer for populist trends. The negative sentiment towards AI is further supported by a poll showing a low net approval rating for AI. This negative perception raises questions about the future of AI and its impact on society.
The author concludes by suggesting that addressing this negative sentiment is crucial for the development of AI. They propose a program of rejecting generative AI in extractive and exploitative circumstances, protecting labor from deskilling and wage degradation, and refusing AI's intrusion into public life. This perspective highlights the need for a balanced approach to AI development, considering both its potential benefits and the potential negative consequences.
In summary, the article explores the public's reaction to AI through the lens of commencement speeches, highlighting the importance of addressing negative sentiment and the potential implications for the future of AI and society.
